linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:43:25 -0800
From:	Bryan Henderson <hbryan@...ibm.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Chinner <dgc@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
	Ric Wheeler <ric@....com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Valerie Henson <val.henson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck)

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote on 01/18/2008 07:08:30 AM:

> Bryan Henderson wrote:
> > 
> > We weren't actually talking about writing out the cache.  While that 
was 
> > part of an earlier thread which ultimately conceded that disk drives 
most 
> > probably do not use the spinning disk energy to write out the cache, 
the 
> > claim was then made that the drive at least survives long enough to 
finish 
> > writing the sector it was writing, thereby maintaining the integrity 
of 
> > the data at the drive level.  People often say that a disk drive 
> > guarantees atomic writes at the sector level even in the face of a 
power 
> > failure.
> > 
> > But I heard some years ago from a disk drive engineer that that is a 
myth 
> > just like the rotational energy thing.  I added that to the 
discussion, 
> > but admitted that I haven't actually seen a disk drive write a partial 

> > sector.
> > 
> 
> A disk drive whose power is cut needs to have enough residual power to 
> park its heads (or *massive* data loss will occur), and at that point it 

> might as well keep enough on hand to finish an in-progress sector write.
> 
> There are two possible sources of onboard temporary power: a large 
> enough capacitor, or the rotational energy of the platters (an 
> electrical motor also being a generator.)  I don't care which one they 
> use, but they need to do something.

I believe the power for that comes from a third source: a spring.  Parking 
the heads is too important to leave to active circuits.

--
Bryan Henderson                     IBM Almaden Research Center
San Jose CA                         Filesystems

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/