[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JFwJb-00018k-I1@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:51:43 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: riel@...hat.com
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, miklos@...redi.hu, salikhmetov@...il.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu, ksm@...dk,
staubach@...hat.com, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, protasnb@...il.com,
r.e.wolff@...wizard.nl, hidave.darkstar@...il.com,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped
files
> > > And even in that four-liner, I suspect that the *last* two lines are
> > > actually incorrect: there's no point in updating the file time when the
> > > page *becomes* dirty,
> >
> > Actually all four lines do that. The first two for a write access on
> > a present, read-only pte, the other two for a write on a non-present
> > pte.
> >
> > > we should update the file time when it is marked
> > > clean, and "msync(MS_SYNC)" should update it as part of *that*.
> >
> > That would need a new page flag (PG_mmap_dirty?). Do we have one
> > available?
>
> I thought the page writing stuff looked at (and cleared) the pte
> dirty bit, too?
Yeah, it does. Hmm...
What happens on munmap? The times _could_ get updated from there as
well, but it's getting complicated.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists