[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47910B0F.5070500@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:24:47 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
ehabkost@...hat.com, avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
ak@...e.de, chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
hpa@...or.com, zach@...are.com, roland@...hat.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] change function orders in paravirt.h
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> __pmd, pmd_val and set_pud are used before they are defined (as static)
> We move them a little up in the file, so it doesn't happen.
>
Hm, in my original patches I put the #ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE below the
PAGETABLE_LEVELS section. Does that work? Or is that an equivalent
transform?
J
> Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/asm-x86/paravirt.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/paravirt.h b/include/asm-x86/paravirt.h
> index 3e7ca42..12caaf1 100644
> --- a/include/asm-x86/paravirt.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/paravirt.h
> @@ -1023,6 +1023,48 @@ static inline void set_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd)
> PVOP_VCALL2(pv_mmu_ops.set_pmd, pmdp, val);
> }
>
> +#if PAGETABLE_LEVELS >= 3
> +static inline pmd_t __pmd(pmdval_t val)
> +{
> + pmdval_t ret;
> +
> + if (sizeof(pmdval_t) > sizeof(long))
> + ret = PVOP_CALL2(pmdval_t, pv_mmu_ops.make_pmd,
> + val, (u64)val >> 32);
> + else
> + ret = PVOP_CALL1(pmdval_t, pv_mmu_ops.make_pmd,
> + val);
> +
> + return (pmd_t) { ret };
> +}
> +
> +static inline pmdval_t pmd_val(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> + pmdval_t ret;
> +
> + if (sizeof(pmdval_t) > sizeof(long))
> + ret = PVOP_CALL2(pmdval_t, pv_mmu_ops.pmd_val,
> + pmd.pmd, (u64)pmd.pmd >> 32);
> + else
> + ret = PVOP_CALL1(pmdval_t, pv_mmu_ops.pmd_val,
> + pmd.pmd);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud)
> +{
> + pudval_t val = native_pud_val(pud);
> +
> + if (sizeof(pudval_t) > sizeof(long))
> + PVOP_VCALL3(pv_mmu_ops.set_pud, pudp,
> + val, (u64)val >> 32);
> + else
> + PVOP_VCALL2(pv_mmu_ops.set_pud, pudp,
> + val);
> +}
> +#endif /* PAGETABLE_LEVELS >= 3 */
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
> /* Special-case pte-setting operations for PAE, which can't update a
> 64-bit pte atomically */
> @@ -1073,48 +1115,6 @@ static inline void pmd_clear(pmd_t *pmdp)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_PAE */
>
> -#if PAGETABLE_LEVELS >= 3
> -static inline pmd_t __pmd(pmdval_t val)
> -{
> - pmdval_t ret;
> -
> - if (sizeof(pmdval_t) > sizeof(long))
> - ret = PVOP_CALL2(pmdval_t, pv_mmu_ops.make_pmd,
> - val, (u64)val >> 32);
> - else
> - ret = PVOP_CALL1(pmdval_t, pv_mmu_ops.make_pmd,
> - val);
> -
> - return (pmd_t) { ret };
> -}
> -
> -static inline pmdval_t pmd_val(pmd_t pmd)
> -{
> - pmdval_t ret;
> -
> - if (sizeof(pmdval_t) > sizeof(long))
> - ret = PVOP_CALL2(pmdval_t, pv_mmu_ops.pmd_val,
> - pmd.pmd, (u64)pmd.pmd >> 32);
> - else
> - ret = PVOP_CALL1(pmdval_t, pv_mmu_ops.pmd_val,
> - pmd.pmd);
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud)
> -{
> - pudval_t val = native_pud_val(pud);
> -
> - if (sizeof(pudval_t) > sizeof(long))
> - PVOP_VCALL3(pv_mmu_ops.set_pud, pudp,
> - val, (u64)val >> 32);
> - else
> - PVOP_VCALL2(pv_mmu_ops.set_pud, pudp,
> - val);
> -}
> -#endif /* PAGETABLE_LEVELS >= 3 */
> -
> /* Lazy mode for batching updates / context switch */
> enum paravirt_lazy_mode {
> PARAVIRT_LAZY_NONE,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists