[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0801181325510.2957@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:27:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com>
cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
protasnb@...il.com, r.e.wolff@...wizard.nl,
hidave.darkstar@...il.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped
files
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
>
> Before using pte_wrprotect() the vma_wrprotect() routine uses the
> pte_offset_map_lock() macro to get the PTE and to acquire the ptl
> spinlock. Why did you say that this code was not SMP-safe? It should
> be atomic, I think.
It's atomic WITH RESPECT TO OTHER PEOPLE WHO GET THE LOCK.
Guess how much another x86 CPU cares when it sets the accessed bit in
hardware?
> The POSIX standard requires the ctime and mtime stamps to be updated
> not later than at the second call to msync() with the MS_ASYNC flag.
.. and that is no excuse for bad code.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists