linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk deadlocks if called with runqueue lock held

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:52:47 -0500 (EST)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org>,
	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk deadlocks if called with runqueue lock held


On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> IOW, I think this should be
>
> 	if (raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags) && wake_klogd)
> 		wake_up_klogd();
>
> Of course, not all architectures seem to suport that thing (it's currently
> only used by the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS config option).
>
> Damn. So close, yet so far away.

Perhaps we can define something like:

#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_RAW_IRQS_DISABLED_FLAGS
# define test_irqs_disabled_flags(flags) raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)
#else
# define test_irqs_disabled_flags(flags) \
	({ (void)flags; irqs_disabled();})
#endif

then we could do

	if (test_irqs_disabled_flags(flags) && wake_klogd)
		wake_up_klogd();

Or is this asking too much ;-)

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/