linux-kernel - Re: Why not creating a GIT RT tree ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3zlv2kd6t.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:59:22 +0000
From:	James Cloos <cloos@...loos.com>
To:	"Francis Moreau" <francis.moro@...il.com>
Cc:	rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why not creating a GIT RT tree ?

>>>>> "Francis" == Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com> writes:

Francis> I can't find a rt tree anywhere and all new rt release spoke
Francis> about a patchset to apply on mainline kernels.

It is not perfect, but I do have a git repo of the rt history-of-patches
up at:

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cloos/rt-2.6.git
http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cloos/rt-2.6.git

Gitweb URL is:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cloos/rt-2.6.git

It is in the one-head per patch style, and has the single-file patches
applied rather than the quilt queue.

But it will at least allow comparisons among the various versions.

The master head matches the most current patch.

(I try to keep it updated the same day as patches are announced, but
it does sometimes lag a day or two.)

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@...loos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/