[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479008E5.1070706@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:03:17 -0500
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, airlied@...ux.ie,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [mm patch] i915: fix invalid opcode exception on cpus without
clflush
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> i915_flush_ttm was unconditionally executing a clflush instruction
> to (obviously) flush the cache. Instead, check if the cpu supports
> clflush, and if not, fall back to calling wbinvd to flush the entire
> cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kmcmartin@...hat.com>
>
> --- a/drivers/char/drm/i915_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/drm/i915_buffer.c
> @@ -286,7 +286,18 @@ void i915_flush_ttm(struct drm_ttm *ttm)
> return;
>
> DRM_MEMORYBARRIER();
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> + /* Hopefully nobody has built an x86-64 processor without clflush */
> + if (!cpu_has_clflush) {
> + wbinvd();
> + DRM_MEMORYBARRIER();
> + return;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> for (i = ttm->num_pages - 1; i >= 0; i--)
> drm_cache_flush_page(drm_ttm_get_page(ttm, i));
> +
> DRM_MEMORYBARRIER();
> }
The #ifdef is bogus. If it's required, it should go into
asm-x86/required_features.h and then cpu_has_clflush is static;
otherwise it's just plain wrong.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists