lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:24:51 -0200
From:	"Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <>
Cc:	"Zachary Amsden" <>,
	"Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Tree fixes for PARAVIRT

On Jan 18, 2008 8:02 PM, Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
> * Zachary Amsden <> wrote:
> > > but in exchange you broke all of 32-bit with CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y.
> > > Which means you did not even build-test it on 32-bit, let alone boot
> > > test it...
> >
> > Why are we rushing so much to do 64-bit paravirt that we are breaking
> > working configurations?  If the developement is going to be this
> > chaotic, it should be done and tested out of tree until it can
> > stabilize.
> what you see is a open feedback cycle conducted on lkml. People send
> patches for arch/x86, and we tell them if it breaks something. The bug
> was found before i pushed out the x86.git devel tree (and the fix is
> below - but this shouldnt matter to you because the bug never hit a
> public x86.git tree).
>         Ingo
Other than this, it seems to build and boot fine.

Do you want me to resend ?
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists