[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:44:52 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Ash Willis <ashwillis@...grammer.net>,
linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Makes lguest's irq handler typesafe
Tejun Heo wrote:
> so I think the question is "do we want to change all callbacks to
> take native pointer type instead of void pointer?".
Lemme clarity myself a bit. I'm not saying that we should convert all
at once or literally every callback should be converted. What I'm
saying is whether we're headed that way in general and converting big
ones - timer for example - and getting the conversion agreed upon should
be enough to set the norm.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists