[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47918792.2080201@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:16:02 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Announce] Development release 0.1 of the LatencyTOP tool
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> The Intel Open Source Technology Center is pleased to announce the
>> release of version 0.1 of LatencyTOP, a tool for developers to visualize
>> system latencies.
>
> Just for completeness -- Linux already had a way to profile latencies
> since quite some time. It's little known unfortunately and doesn't
> work for modules since it's a special mode in the old non modular kernel
> profiler.
>
> You enable CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS and boot with profile=sleep and then you can
> use the readprofile command to read the data. Information can be reset with
> echo > /proc/profile
>
> There's also a profile=sched to profile the scheduler which works even
> without CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
yes indeed; I sort of use the same infrastructure inside the scheduler; the biggest
reason I felt I had to do something different was that I wanted to do per process
data collection, so that you can see for a specific process what was going on.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists