[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4792D221.1010704@davidnewall.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:16:25 +1030
From: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for mm] Remove iBCS support
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 12:57:29PM +1030, David Newall wrote:
>
>> compatibility. This is a sleeping giant for Linux. There are plenty of
>>
>
> Interesting choice of words.
>
KFC and Dominoes use SCO for their cash registers, to pick just two
enormous future opportunities.
> But it does not make sense for all Linux kernels to always check for iBCS executables
> when they don't have to code to run them anyways.
>
I don't suppose you're suggesting this will make a big difference. Even
if every exec did nothing but immediately exit, it still wouldn't make
much difference.
Likewise, I take your point about proper iBCS support (and I suppose
it's really iBCS2 that we're talking about.) My concern is that
removing this now gains almost nothing, 2 strcmp per exec is as close to
nothing as anything, but it sends a message with which I disagree. The
message should be that Linux is good for, well the same things FreeBSD
is, and includes running Solaris and SCO binaries. This is a major
simplification of the story, I know, but still hits the plot highlights.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists