[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1200827066.3713.4.camel@queen>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:04:26 +0100
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allocate pnp resources dynamically via krealloc
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 02:23 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Jan 19, 2008 10:00 PM, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de> wrote:
> > +static int pnp_alloc_port(struct pnp_resource_table *res)
> > +{
>
> [snip]
>
> > + res->port_resource = krealloc(res->port_resource,
> > + (sizeof(struct resource) * res->allocated_ports)
> > + + (sizeof(struct resource) * PNP_ALLOC_PORT), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
> > + if (!res->port_resource)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> When krealloc() returns NULL, there wasn't enough memory to fit the
> new size but the original memory region remains unchanged. Therefore
> you must not unconditionally overwrite the res->port_resource with the
> return value of krealloc(); otherwise you might leak memory.
>
Thanks.
While looking at this I found something else..., I think I sent an old
version.
Please hold off, I will double check and resend soon.
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists