[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47934604.6080505@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:00:52 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] RFC: Typesafe callbacks
Tejun Heo wrote:
> * Passing NULL as data to callback which takes non-void pointer
> triggers warning. I think this should be allowed. Something like
> the following?
Please ignore the last sentence.
> * Allowing non-pointer integral types which fit into pointer would be
> nice. It's often convenient to pass integers to simple callbacks.
>
> The following macro kinda-sorta achieves the above two but it doesn't
> consider promotion of integer types and thus is too strict. There
> gotta be some way.
What should be do are
* Check that the threadfn's argument fits into void *.
* Trigger overflow in implicit constant conversion warning if the
specified data is too large for the argument type.
Tricky...
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists