[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080120130633.76c16d67@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:06:33 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for mm] Remove iBCS support
> It's not necessarily that simple. It might be for KFC and Dominoes, but
> for others, SCO is not the complete story. Many legacy systems are
> written in COBOL, and must pay a per-seat licence for that on top of the
> per-seat licence for UNIX. It is these systems that are most attracted
> towards SCO compatibility.
And they mostly use microfocus cobol which is available on Linux and uses
a vm is a trivial port, or they do a quick port to the fujitsu
cobol->java vm translator.
There are people in this community who deal day in and day out with
migrations. I don't hear a whisper of concern from those I deal with
about losing iBCS.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists