[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080120145844.GN8973@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:28:44 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <righiandr@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Naveen Gupta <ngupta@...gle.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: limit block I/O bandwidth
* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> [2008-01-20 15:32:40]:
> On Sun, Jan 20 2008, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Your approach is totally flawed, imho. For instance, you don't want a
> process to be able to dirty memory at foo mb/sec but only actually
> write them out at bar mb/sec.
>
> The noop-iosched changes are also very buggy. The queue back pointer
> breaks reference counting and the task pointer storage assumes the task
> will also always be around. That's of course not the case.
>
> IOW, you are doing this at the wrong level.
Andrea, Some of the problems pointed out so far have been solved in
the IO controller from OpenVZ (cc'ing Pavel for inputs).
>
> What problem are you trying to solve?
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists