linux-kernel - Re: kbuild: improved Section mismatch detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080121025111.GA26076@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:51:11 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kbuild: improved Section mismatch detection

On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >...
> > Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
> > another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
> > warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
> >...
> 
> Not -fno-inline but -fno-inline-functions-called-once
> (completely different option).

Yep - looked that up after sending the mail.
A quick test shows no diference in # of generated Section mismatch
warnings for the two - which is good.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/