linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] paravirt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:02:07 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, jeremy@...p.org,
	avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	ak@...e.de, chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	hpa@...or.com, zach@...are.com, roland@...hat.com,
	mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] paravirt_ops-64 compile fixes


* Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com> wrote:

> This series contain fixes to make the paravirt_ops code compile and 
> boot on x86_64.
> 
> This is a follow-up for the previous series from Glauber.

thanks Eduardo, i've applied your fixes.

could you perhaps send the missing bits that add the missing 64-bit 
Kconfig entries? Even if the 64-bit side is not functional yet as a real 
guest, it would help us find the build bugs and any runtime regressions 
PARAVIRT might cause on the native 64-bit side of the kernel.

Or is it now just a matter of removing all the depends-on X86_32 bits in 
arch/x86/Kconfig?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/