[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080122120207.GA30271@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:02:07 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, jeremy@...p.org,
avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
ak@...e.de, chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
hpa@...or.com, zach@...are.com, roland@...hat.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] paravirt_ops-64 compile fixes
* Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com> wrote:
> This series contain fixes to make the paravirt_ops code compile and
> boot on x86_64.
>
> This is a follow-up for the previous series from Glauber.
thanks Eduardo, i've applied your fixes.
could you perhaps send the missing bits that add the missing 64-bit
Kconfig entries? Even if the 64-bit side is not functional yet as a real
guest, it would help us find the build bugs and any runtime regressions
PARAVIRT might cause on the native 64-bit side of the kernel.
Or is it now just a matter of removing all the depends-on X86_32 bits in
arch/x86/Kconfig?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists