[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080122121400.GB31253@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:14:00 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...dowen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86
* Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
> [...] I tested this situation on a 4-node NUMA Opteron box. It didn't
> work very well based on a few problems.
>
> - alloc_remap() and SPARSEMEM on HIGHMEM4G explodes [1]
> - Without SRAT, there is a build failure
> - Enabling SRAT requires BOOT_IOREMAP and it explodes early in boot
>
> I have one fix for items 1 and 2 with the patch below. It probably
> should be split in two but lets see if we want to pursue alternative
> fixes to this problem first. In particular, this patch stops SPARSEMEM
> using alloc_remap() because not enough memory is set aside. An
> alternative solution may be to reserve more for alloc_remap() when
> SPARSEMEM is in use.
>
> With the patch applied, an x86-64 capable NUMA Opteron box will boot a
> 32 bit NUMA enabled kernel with DISCONTIGMEM or SPARSEMEM. Due to the
> lack of SRAT parsing, there is only node 0 of course.
>
> Based on this, I have no doubt there is going to be a series of broken
> boots while stuff like this gets rattled out. For the moment, NUMA on
> x86 32-bit should remain CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.
thanks, applied.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists