| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:20:48 +0100 From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com> To: apw@...dowen.org, "Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add filename in the summary On Jan 14, 2008 11:23 PM, Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com> wrote: > Add a filename option (default to 0) > in order to get the following summary output: > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --filename --file ./arch/sparc/kernel/apc.c > ... > ... > ... > ./arch/sparc/kernel/apc.c --> total: 18 errors, 3 warnings, 186 lines checked > --- > > Andy, > I wonder why checkpatch doesn't show all the command line options. > At the moment, it only prints: > options: -q => quiet > --no-tree => run without a kernel tree > --terse => one line per report > --emacs => emacs compile window format > --file => check a source file > --strict => enable more subjective tests > --root => path to the kernel tree root > > but I see a lot more options: > q|quiet > tree > signoff > patch > test-type > emacs > terse > file > subjective > strict > root=s > summary > mailback > [patch snipped] Hi Andy, do you plan to document all the command line options that checkpatch is currently accepting? Thanks. Ciao, -- Paolo http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists