[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801221623.42989.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:23:42 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) <oliver.pntr@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: konqueror deadlocks on 2.6.22
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) <oliver.pntr@...il.com> wrote:
> > and then please update to CFS-v24.1
> > http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.1
> >.patch
> >
> > > Yes with CFSv20.4, as in the log.
> > >
> > > It also hangs on 2.6.23.13
>
> my feeling is that this is some sort of timing dependent race in
> konqueror/kde/qt that is exposed when a different scheduler is put in.
>
> If it disappears with CFS-v24.1 it is probably just because the timings
> will change again. Would be nice to debug this on the konqueror side and
> analyze why it fails and how. You can probably tune the timings by
> enabling SCHED_DEBUG and tweaking /proc/sys/kernel/*sched* values - in
> particular sched_latency and the granularity settings. Setting wakeup
> granularity to 0 might be one of the things that could make a
> difference.
Thanks Ingo, but Mike suggested that data=writeback may make a difference,
which it does indeed.
So the bug seems to be related to data=ordered, although I haven't gotten any
feedback from the ext3 gurus yet.
Seems rather critical though, as data=writeback is a dangerous mode to run.
Thanks!
--
Al
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists