[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080122143933.GA11111@agk.fab.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:39:33 +0000
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, jplatte@...sa.net,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
James.Bottomley@...eleye.com, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 11:01:11AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> At least, rc1-rc5 have shown that the CCISS system can do well. Now
> the question is which part of the system does not cope well with the
> larger IO sizes? Is it the CCISS controller, LVM or both. I am open to
> suggestions on how to debug that.
What is your LVM device configuration?
E.g. 'dmsetup table' and 'dmsetup info -c' output.
Some configurations lead to large IOs getting split up on the way through
device-mapper.
See if these patches make any difference:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/agk/patches/2.6/editing/
dm-md-merge_bvec_fn-with-separate-bdev-and-sector.patch
dm-introduce-merge_bvec_fn.patch
dm-linear-add-merge.patch
dm-table-remove-merge_bvec-sector-restriction.patch
Alasdair
--
agk@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists