linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v7 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4df4ef0c0801211740i168a82e6ha8992710da81f0b1@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:40:52 +0300
From:	"Anton Salikhmetov" <salikhmetov@...il.com>
To:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
	riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, protasnb@...il.com, miklos@...redi.hu,
	r.e.wolff@...wizard.nl, hidave.darkstar@...il.com,
	hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

2008/1/22, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>:
> On 22/01/2008, Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com> wrote:
> > This is the seventh version of my solution for the bug #2645:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> >
> > Since the previous version, the following has changed: based on
> > Linus' comment, SMP-safe PTE update implemented.
> >
> > Discussions, which followed my past submissions, showed that it was
> > tempting to approach this problem using very different assumptions.
> > However, many such designs have proved to be incomplete or inefficient.
> >
> > Taking into account the obvious complexity of this problem, I prepared a
> > design document, the purpose of which is twofold. First, it summarizes
> > previous attempts to resolve the ctime/mtime issue. Second, it attempts
> > to prove that what the patches do is necessary and sufficient for mtime
> > and ctime update provided that we start from a certain sane set of
> > requirements. The design document is available via the following link:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645#c40
> >
> > For the seventh version, comprehensive performance testing was performed.
> > The results of performance tests, including numbers, are available here:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645#c43
> >
>
> Hi Anton,
>
> I applied your patches here and as far as my own test programs go,
> these patches solve the previously observed problems I saw with mtime
> not getting updated.
>
> Thank you very much for so persistently working on these long standing issues.

Thank you very much for testing these patches!

>
> --
> Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
> Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/