linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc7 to 2.6.24-rc8 possible regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1201019283.6341.28.camel@lappy>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:28:03 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7 to 2.6.24-rc8 possible regression


On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 17:23 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > No, i am using vanilla kernel. It is one of production machines, and as i 
> > know screen is not using epoll.
> 
> OK, but the trace shows that it is the epoll recursion again.
> 
> > I will try to apply on all my production machines this patch. Sorry if it is 
> > related.
> 
> Well, let's hope that the lockdep annotation or whatever other fix gets
> into mainline sooner than later.  Which reminds me to test my setup
> again which appeared to be able to reproduce the __wake_up recursion on
> my command...

Would be appreciated, I have been waiting on testing feedback because
I'm not fully certain here.

Curious though that this gets reported frequently the last few weeks,
afaics this problem is way old.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/