linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: don't take a mutex from interrupt context

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:47:34 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: don't take a mutex from interrupt context


On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 22:21 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:25:38PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > @@ -1428,9 +1428,9 @@ static void print_cfs_stats(struct seq_f
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> >  	print_cfs_rq(m, cpu, &cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs);
> >  #endif
> > -	lock_task_group_list();
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> >  	for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(cpu_rq(cpu), cfs_rq)
> >  		print_cfs_rq(m, cpu, cfs_rq);
> 
> Isn't there a possibility that print_cfs_rq() can block?

It should not, that would be another bug, but from a quick glance at the
code it doesn't do that.

> 
> > -	unlock_task_group_list();
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> >  }
> >  #endif
> > 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/