[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080122185615.4a8ebbea@hyperion.delvare>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:56:15 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: "Felipe Balbi" <felipebalbi@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david-b@...bell.net,
tony@...mide.com, "Linux I2C" <i2c@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] I2C: ISP1301_OMAP: New-style i2c driver updates,
part 2
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:13:58 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008 2:01 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:59:57 -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > - if (machine_is_omap_h2())
> > > - omap_free_gpio(2);
> > > -
> >
> > Why?
>
> Board specific code should go to board files. I'll try to find a
> better way of doing this. Maybe using a private_data.
> Ditto to all cases below.
I agree that board code should ideally not be there, however you can't
just drop it and hope nobody will notice. It needs to be done in such a
way that everything still works afterwards. IMHO it is better move such
changes to a later patch so as to not make this one needlessly complex.
> > (Did you test you patch on OMAP H2?)
>
> Can't remember anymore, but before applying these patches isp1301 was
> crashing the kernel on H2 and H3.
That's bad, this should be fixed, if possible even before applying your
patches.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists