[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1201029427.14436.54.camel@cinder.waste.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:17:07 -0600
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux-tiny@...enic.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional
arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 19:58 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 10:37:19AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 15:39 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > threadinfo-ool.patch: doesnt this break the scheduler?
> >
> > It didn't when I wrote it, 3+ years ago. But I'm sure it needs to be
> > revisited.
> >
> > > tiny-cflags.patch: obsolete? Isnt CFLAGS already extendable? Question to
> > > Sam i guess.
> And what was the question then?
>
> We have today the possibility to say:
> make KCFLAGS=-whatever
>
> and we have plenty of kconfig adjustmenst affecting the gcc options.
>
> I do not know if this covers it.
Basically the idea was you could specify various flags that affected
kernel size, in particular overriding the various bloated alignment
defaults.
If I were to do this today (if they haven't already become the default),
I'd probably add a config var to request minimal alignment instead.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists