[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a8748490801211816y4bcd6fefqfb3f2c2af1bbe970@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:16:38 +0100
From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To: "Anton Salikhmetov" <salikhmetov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, protasnb@...il.com, miklos@...redi.hu,
r.e.wolff@...wizard.nl, hidave.darkstar@...il.com,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7 2/2] Update ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
On 22/01/2008, Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com> wrote:
> 2008/1/22, Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com>:
> > 2008/1/22, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>:
> > > Some very pedantic nitpicking below;
> > >
...
>
> By the way, if we're talking "pedantic", then:
>
> >>>
>
> debian:/tmp$ cat c.c
> void f()
> {
> for (unsigned long i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> continue;
> }
> debian:/tmp$ gcc -c -pedantic c.c
> c.c: In function 'f':
> c.c:3: error: 'for' loop initial declaration used outside C99 mode
> debian:/tmp$
>
Well, I just wrote the way I'd have writen the loop, I know it's not
the common kernel style. Just offering my feedback/input :)
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists