[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1201036079.16972.65.camel@brick>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:07:59 -0800
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...umbus.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make nx_enabled conditional on CONFIG_X86_PAE
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 13:00 -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> nx_enabled can only be set to non-zero when CONFIG_X86_PAE is
> set. The only use not currently inside a CONFIG_X86_PAE block
> is the definition, the declaration and a conditional unlikely
> test in fault_32.c (is_prefetch).
>
> When !CONFIG_X86_PAE, is_prefetch always returns 0 immediately
> as nx_enabled is always 0.
>
> When CONFIG_X86_PAE, the test is preserved, but the test against
> the cpu model and stepping is deleted, this may not be correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> ---
Sorry, I missed the usage in kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S, that's the only
other user. I don't know that code well enough to comment on the usage
there, but if anybody knows if that could be conditionalized, please
advise.
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists