linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc7 to 2.6.24-rc8 possible regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:54:25 -0800 (PST)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7 to 2.6.24-rc8 possible regression

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Stefan Richter wrote:

> (adding Cc: Davide and akpm)
> 
> On 22 Jan, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 17:23 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> >> Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> >> > No, i am using vanilla kernel. It is one of production machines, and as i 
> >> > know screen is not using epoll.
> >> 
> >> OK, but the trace shows that it is the epoll recursion again.
> >> 
> >> > I will try to apply on all my production machines this patch. Sorry if it is 
> >> > related.
> >> 
> >> Well, let's hope that the lockdep annotation or whatever other fix gets
> >> into mainline sooner than later.  Which reminds me to test my setup
> >> again which appeared to be able to reproduce the __wake_up recursion on
> >> my command...
> > 
> > Would be appreciated, I have been waiting on testing feedback because
> > I'm not fully certain here.
> > 
> > Curious though that this gets reported frequently the last few weeks,
> > afaics this problem is way old.
> 
> Here is a report against Fedora's 2.6.23-0.222.rc9.git4.fc8, filed in
> October:  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=323411
> 
> I did several tests with a pristine 2.6.24-rc8 now.  The lockdep warning
> below is 100% reliably triggered by grabbing video from a DV camcorder
> with dvgrab v3 via firewire-core's character device file ABI.
> 
> Also, this warning is 100% reliably suppressed by your annotation patch.
> I will reply to this message with this patch for kind consideration by
> those concerned. :-)

Patch? Where is it?



- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/