[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080122234051.GP8075@agk.fab.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:40:52 +0000
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, jplatte@...sa.net,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
James.Bottomley@...eleye.com, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:25:15AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> [root@...dm52 ~]# dmsetup table
> VolGroup00-LogVol02: 0 350945280 linear 104:2 67109248
> VolGroup00-LogVol01: 0 8388608 linear 104:2 418054528
> VolGroup00-LogVol00: 0 67108864 linear 104:2 384
The IO should pass straight through simple linear targets like that without
needing to get broken up, so I wouldn't expect those patches to make any
difference in this particular case.
Alasdair
--
agk@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists