linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk, take #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:57:09 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	daniel.ritz-ml@...ssonline.ch, jeff@...zik.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk,
 take #2


On Jan 23 2008 08:51, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>What do you think about the second suggestion then?
>
>ata1.00: line0
>ata1.00  line1
>ata1.00  line2
>
>It allows you to grab for the header && has indication for message
>boundaries.

Then again, why not "[ata1.00] line0", then it matches what sd_mod does :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/