linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 12/23 -v4] Use RCU algorithm for monotonic cycles.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:20:58 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	John Stultz <johstul@...ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/23 -v4] Use RCU algorithm for monotonic cycles.

On Tuesday 22 January 2008 02:22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>

>  static inline cycle_t
> -clocksource_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs, cycle_t now)
> +clocksource_get_basecycles(struct clocksource *cs)
>  {
> -	cycle_t offset = (now - cs->cycle_last) & cs->mask;
> -	offset += cs->cycle_accumulated;
> +	int num;
> +	cycle_t now, offset;
> +
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	num = cs->base_num;
> +	smp_read_barrier_depends();

All barriers need comments in the code. eg. with read barriers, the
comment should contain a list of the loads being ordered, and a
reference to the places where stores come from.

I know it isn't too hard to follow _now_, but it makes the code more
maintainable.


> +	now = clocksource_read(cs);
> +	offset = (now - cs->base[num].cycle_base_last);
> +	offset &= cs->mask;
> +	offset += cs->base[num].cycle_base;
> +	preempt_enable();
> +
>  	return offset;
>  }
>
> @@ -197,14 +215,26 @@ clocksource_get_cycles(struct clocksourc
>   * @now:	current cycle value
>   *
>   * Used to avoids clocksource hardware overflow by periodically
> - * accumulating the current cycle delta. Must hold xtime write lock!
> + * accumulating the current cycle delta. Uses RCU-like update, but
> + * ***still requires the xtime_lock is held for writing!***
>   */
>  static inline void clocksource_accumulate(struct clocksource *cs, cycle_t
> now) {
> -	cycle_t offset = (now - cs->cycle_last) & cs->mask;
> +	/* First update the monotonic base portion.
> +	 * The dual array update method allows for lock-free reading.
> +	 */
> +	int num = 1 - cs->base_num;
> +	cycle_t offset = (now - cs->base[1-num].cycle_base_last);
> +	offset &= cs->mask;
> +	cs->base[num].cycle_base = cs->base[1-num].cycle_base + offset;
> +	cs->base[num].cycle_base_last = now;
> +	wmb();
> +	cs->base_num = num;

Ditto for the wmb. Also, I think the wmb() can probably just be
smp_wmb().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/