| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:32:40 +0000 From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com> To: "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com> Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <mingo@...e.hu>, <tony.luck@...el.com>, <paulus@...ba.org>, <gregkh@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] constify struct attribute_group uses (against -mm) >>> Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> 22.01.08 23:15 >>> >On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:31:21PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: >> .. as all consumers of it don't require it to be modifiable. >> >> Unfortunately, due to the two-level constifications, this required >> touching quite many files, not all of which I am able to test - please >> bare with eventual mistakes or oversights. >> >> The patch doesn't change all instances where 'const' could have been >> added as a result of the base structure changes, only where either the >> change has a real effect (the module loader doesn't enforce read-only >> section attributes at present, so only built-in files matter) or where >> compiler warnings would result otherwise. > >Which -mm is this against? Seems to not apply here :( 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 - I'm keeping the name in the diff headers so that one can easily identify the baseline a patch is against, as in --- 2.6.24-rc8-mm1-const.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/err_inject.c +++ 2.6.24-rc8-mm1-const/arch/ia64/kernel/err_inject.c Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists