linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND][PATCH-2.6.24-rc8] Fix fakephp deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:46:39 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	pcihpd-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net, gregkh@...e.de,
	kristen.c.accardi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH-2.6.24-rc8] Fix fakephp deadlock

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 02:28:08PM +0000, Ian Abbott wrote:
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include "../pci.h"
> #if !defined(MODULE)
> @@ -63,10 +64,13 @@ struct dummy_slot {
> 	struct list_head node;
> 	struct hotplug_slot *slot;
> 	struct pci_dev *dev;
> +	struct work_struct remove_work;
> +	unsigned long removed;

You are treating "removed" as an atomic value, so why not just make it
an atomic_t?

And what is protecting the fact that the flag could be set right after
it gets checked?  I don't see a lock here :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/