[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801231036440.11430@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:51:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
hanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
lee.schermerhorn@...com, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix boot problem in situations where the boot CPU is
running on a memoryless node
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Fine. But, why are we hitting fallback_alloc() in the first place? It's
> definitely not because of missing ->nodelists as we do:
>
> cache_cache.nodelists[node] = &initkmem_list3[CACHE_CACHE];
>
> before attempting to set up kmalloc caches. Now, if I understood
> correctly, we're booting off a memoryless node so kmem_getpages() will
> return NULL thus forcing us to fallback_alloc() which is unavailable at
> this point.
>
> As far as I can tell, there are two ways to fix this:
>
> (1) don't boot off a memoryless node (why are we doing this in the first
> place?)
Right. That is the solution that I would prefer.
> (2) initialize cache_cache.nodelists with initmem_list3 equivalents
> for *each node hat has normal memory*
Or simply do it for all. SLAB bootstrap is very complex thing though.
>
> I am still wondering why this worked before, though.
I doubt it did ever work for SLAB.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists