lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080123220608.GD2282@Krystal>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:06:08 -0500
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	mbligh@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Userspace tracing memory mappings

* Dave Hansen (haveblue@...ibm.com) wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 11:04 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Since memory management is not my speciality, I would like to know if
> > there are some implementation details I should be aware of for my
> > LTTng userspace tracing buffers. Here is what I want to do :
> 
> Can you start with a little background by telling us what a userspace
> tracing buffer _is_?  Maybe a few requirements about what you need it to
> do and why, as well?
> 
> -- Dave
> 

Sure,

Userspace tracing is :

- A userspace process wants to record information to a circular ring
  buffer. This information has a timestamp. It should disrupt the
  timings minimally. The timestamps must be synchronized with the
  timestamps given to the kernel trace events so we can analyze all the
  information together.

- When one subbuffer of the ring buffer is filled, the information is
  ready to be read by a "trace dumping" process and sent to disk or to
  the network. At this point, the traced process raises a flag that will
  be checked periodically by the OS to wake up the disk/network dumper
  daemon. (for future reference, I use the term "buffer writer" when I
  talk about the traced process and the term "buffer reader" when
  talking about the disk/network dumper daemon).

There is more information in the email I sent to Frank Eigler. Please
feel free to ask for more if I am not clear about specific points.

A lot of the background information is already explained in the kernel
tracing paper I presented at OLS2006, it might be a good start :

http://ltt.polymtl.ca/papers/desnoyers-ols2006.pdf

Another requirement I am trying to meet is protection of tracing buffers
against corruption coming from other userspace process. K42 implemented
their tracing buffers shared system-wide : with the OS too. The
processes have full access to the kernel buffers and can therefore
corrupt the whole system's trace. This is something I would like not to
allow.

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ