| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:07:04 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....EDU>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, girish@...sterfs.com,
adilger@...sterfs.com, shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/49] ext4: Add the journal checksum feature
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:02:12 -0500 "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....EDU> wrote:
> From: Girish Shilamkar <girish@...sterfs.com>
>
> The journal checksum feature adds two new flags i.e
> JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ASYNC_COMMIT and JBD2_FEATURE_COMPAT_CHECKSUM.
>
> JBD2_FEATURE_CHECKSUM flag indicates that the commit block contains the
> checksum for the blocks described by the descriptor blocks.
> Due to checksums, writing of the commit record no longer needs to be
> synchronous. Now commit record can be sent to disk without waiting for
> descriptor blocks to be written to disk. This behavior is controlled
> using JBD2_FEATURE_ASYNC_COMMIT flag. Older kernels/e2fsck should not be
> able to recover the journal with _ASYNC_COMMIT hence it is made
> incompat.
> The commit header has been extended to hold the checksum along with the
> type of the checksum.
>
> For recovery in pass scan checksums are verified to ensure the sanity
> and completeness(in case of _ASYNC_COMMIT) of every transaction.
>
> ...
>
> +static inline __u32 jbd2_checksum_data(__u32 crc32_sum, struct buffer_head *bh)
unneeded inlining.
> +{
> + struct page *page = bh->b_page;
> + char *addr;
> + __u32 checksum;
> +
> + addr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0);
> + checksum = crc32_be(crc32_sum,
> + (void *)(addr + offset_in_page(bh->b_data)), bh->b_size);
> + kunmap_atomic(addr, KM_USER0);
> +
> + return checksum;
> +}
Can this buffer actually be in highmem?
> static inline void write_tag_block(int tag_bytes, journal_block_tag_t *tag,
> unsigned long long block)
More unnecessary inlining.
> +/*
> + * jbd2_journal_clear_features () - Clear a given journal feature in the
> + * superblock
> + * @journal: Journal to act on.
> + * @compat: bitmask of compatible features
> + * @ro: bitmask of features that force read-only mount
> + * @incompat: bitmask of incompatible features
> + *
> + * Clear a given journal feature as present on the
> + * superblock. Returns true if the requested features could be reset.
> + */
> +int jbd2_journal_clear_features(journal_t *journal, unsigned long compat,
> + unsigned long ro, unsigned long incompat)
> +{
> + journal_superblock_t *sb;
> +
> + jbd_debug(1, "Clear features 0x%lx/0x%lx/0x%lx\n",
> + compat, ro, incompat);
> +
> + sb = journal->j_superblock;
> +
> + sb->s_feature_compat &= ~cpu_to_be32(compat);
> + sb->s_feature_ro_compat &= ~cpu_to_be32(ro);
> + sb->s_feature_incompat &= ~cpu_to_be32(incompat);
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(jbd2_journal_clear_features);
Kernel usually returns 0 on success. So we can return a useful errno on
failure.
> +/*
> + * calc_chksums calculates the checksums for the blocks described in the
> + * descriptor block.
> + */
> +static int calc_chksums(journal_t *journal, struct buffer_head *bh,
> + unsigned long *next_log_block, __u32 *crc32_sum)
> +{
> + int i, num_blks, err;
> + unsigned io_block;
> + struct buffer_head *obh;
> +
> + num_blks = count_tags(journal, bh);
> + /* Calculate checksum of the descriptor block. */
> + *crc32_sum = crc32_be(*crc32_sum, (void *)bh->b_data, bh->b_size);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_blks; i++) {
> + io_block = (*next_log_block)++;
unsigned <- unsigned long.
Are all the types appropriate in here?
> + wrap(journal, *next_log_block);
> + err = jread(&obh, journal, io_block);
> + if (err) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "JBD: IO error %d recovering block "
> + "%u in log\n", err, io_block);
> + return 1;
> + } else {
> + *crc32_sum = crc32_be(*crc32_sum, (void *)obh->b_data,
> + obh->b_size);
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> struct recovery_info *info, enum passtype pass)
> {
> @@ -328,6 +360,7 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> unsigned int sequence;
> int blocktype;
> int tag_bytes = journal_tag_bytes(journal);
> + __u32 crc32_sum = ~0; /* Transactional Checksums */
>
> /* Precompute the maximum metadata descriptors in a descriptor block */
> int MAX_BLOCKS_PER_DESC;
> @@ -419,9 +452,23 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> switch(blocktype) {
> case JBD2_DESCRIPTOR_BLOCK:
> /* If it is a valid descriptor block, replay it
> - * in pass REPLAY; otherwise, just skip over the
> - * blocks it describes. */
> + * in pass REPLAY; if journal_checksums enabled, then
> + * calculate checksums in PASS_SCAN, otherwise,
> + * just skip over the blocks it describes. */
> if (pass != PASS_REPLAY) {
> + if (pass == PASS_SCAN &&
> + JBD2_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(journal,
> + JBD2_FEATURE_COMPAT_CHECKSUM) &&
> + !info->end_transaction) {
> + if (calc_chksums(journal, bh,
> + &next_log_block,
> + &crc32_sum)) {
put_bh()
> + brelse(bh);
> + break;
> + }
> + brelse(bh);
> + continue;
put_bh()
> + }
> next_log_block += count_tags(journal, bh);
> wrap(journal, next_log_block);
> brelse(bh);
> @@ -516,9 +563,96 @@ static int do_one_pass(journal_t *journal,
> continue;
>
> + brelse(bh);
etc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists