[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20080123224010.GF18433@webber.adilger.int>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:40:10 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....EDU>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
girish@...sterfs.com, adilger@...sterfs.com,
shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/49] ext4: Add the journal checksum feature
On Jan 23, 2008 14:07 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > +{
> > + struct page *page = bh->b_page;
> > + char *addr;
> > + __u32 checksum;
> > +
> > + addr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0);
> > + checksum = crc32_be(crc32_sum,
> > + (void *)(addr + offset_in_page(bh->b_data)), bh->b_size);
> > + kunmap_atomic(addr, KM_USER0);
> > +
> > + return checksum;
> > +}
>
> Can this buffer actually be in highmem?
Yes, this was found during system testing. While ext3/4 will only allocate
buffer heads in lowmem, the jbd/jbd2 code can allocate buffers in highmem.
I was surprised about this also.
Please see the thread in ext4-devel:
[PATCH][RFC]JBD2: Fix journal checksum kernel oops on NUMA
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists