linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 23/49] Add buffer head related helper functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080124005330.b736f89d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:53:30 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	tytso@....EDU, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/49] Add buffer head related helper functions

> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:52:27 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> + * Returns zero on success and -EIO on error.If the input
> + * buffer is not locked returns -EINVAL
> + *
> + */
> +int bh_submit_read(struct buffer_head *bh)
> +{
> +	if (!buffer_locked(bh))
> +		return -EINVAL;

Is this case just catching a programming bug?

If so, a plain old BUG_ON would be better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/