| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:28:16 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH UPDATE] x86: ignore spurious faults
When changing a kernel page from RO->RW, it's OK to leave stale TLB
entries around, since doing a global flush is expensive and they pose
no security problem. They can, however, generate a spurious fault,
which we should catch and simply return from (which will have the
side-effect of reloading the TLB to the current PTE).
This can occur when running under Xen, because it frequently changes
kernel pages from RW->RO->RW to implement Xen's pagetable semantics.
It could also occur when using CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, since it avoids
doing a global TLB flush after changing page permissions.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
Cc: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
@@ -324,6 +324,51 @@ static int is_f00f_bug(struct pt_regs *r
}
/*
+ * Handle a spurious fault caused by a stale TLB entry. This allows
+ * us to lazily refresh the TLB when increasing the permissions of a
+ * kernel page (RO -> RW or NX -> X). Doing it eagerly is very
+ * expensive since that implies doing a full cross-processor TLB
+ * flush, even if no stale TLB entries exist on other processors.
+ * There are no security implications to leaving a stale TLB when
+ * increasing the permissions on a page.
+ */
+static int spurious_fault(unsigned long address,
+ unsigned long error_code)
+{
+ pgd_t *pgd;
+ pud_t *pud;
+ pmd_t *pmd;
+ pte_t *pte;
+
+ /* Reserved-bit violation or user access to kernel space? */
+ if (error_code & (PF_USER | PF_RSVD))
+ return 0;
+
+ pgd = init_mm.pgd + pgd_index(address);
+ if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
+ return 0;
+
+ pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
+ if (!pud_present(*pud))
+ return 0;
+
+ pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
+ if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
+ return 0;
+
+ pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address);
+ if (!pte_present(*pte))
+ return 0;
+
+ if ((error_code & PF_WRITE) && !pte_write(*pte))
+ return 0;
+ if ((error_code & PF_INSTR) && !pte_exec(*pte))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/*
* Handle a fault on the vmalloc or module mapping area
*
* This assumes no large pages in there.
@@ -446,6 +491,11 @@ void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_r
if (!(error_code & (PF_RSVD|PF_USER|PF_PROT)) &&
vmalloc_fault(address) >= 0)
return;
+
+ /* Can handle a stale RO->RW TLB */
+ if (spurious_fault(address, error_code))
+ return;
+
/*
* Don't take the mm semaphore here. If we fixup a prefetch
* fault we could otherwise deadlock.
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
@@ -312,6 +312,51 @@ static noinline void pgtable_bad(unsigne
}
/*
+ * Handle a spurious fault caused by a stale TLB entry. This allows
+ * us to lazily refresh the TLB when increasing the permissions of a
+ * kernel page (RO -> RW or NX -> X). Doing it eagerly is very
+ * expensive since that implies doing a full cross-processor TLB
+ * flush, even if no stale TLB entries exist on other processors.
+ * There are no security implications to leaving a stale TLB when
+ * increasing the permissions on a page.
+ */
+static int spurious_fault(unsigned long address,
+ unsigned long error_code)
+{
+ pgd_t *pgd;
+ pud_t *pud;
+ pmd_t *pmd;
+ pte_t *pte;
+
+ /* Reserved-bit violation or user access to kernel space? */
+ if (error_code & (PF_USER | PF_RSVD))
+ return 0;
+
+ pgd = init_mm.pgd + pgd_index(address);
+ if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
+ return 0;
+
+ pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
+ if (!pud_present(*pud))
+ return 0;
+
+ pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
+ if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
+ return 0;
+
+ pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address);
+ if (!pte_present(*pte))
+ return 0;
+
+ if ((error_code & PF_WRITE) && !pte_write(*pte))
+ return 0;
+ if ((error_code & PF_INSTR) && !pte_exec(*pte))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/*
* Handle a fault on the vmalloc area
*
* This assumes no large pages in there.
@@ -443,6 +488,11 @@ asmlinkage void __kprobes do_page_fault(
if (vmalloc_fault(address) >= 0)
return;
}
+
+ /* Can handle a stale RO->RW TLB */
+ if (spurious_fault(address, error_code))
+ return;
+
/*
* Don't take the mm semaphore here. If we fixup a prefetch
* fault we could otherwise deadlock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists