[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479854E7.5080404@openvz.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:05:43 +0300
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: righiandr@...rs.sourceforge.net
CC: Naveen Gupta <ngupta@...gle.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: limit block I/O bandwidth
Andrea Righi wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> * Andrea Righi <righiandr@...rs.sourceforge.net> [2008-01-23 16:23:59]:
>>
>>> Probably tracking who dirtied the pages would be the best approach, but
>>> we want also to reduce the overhead of this tracking. So, we should find
>>> a smart way to track which cgroup dirtied the pages and then only when
>>> the i/o scheduler dispatches the write requests of those pages, account
>>> the i/o operations to the opportune cgroup. In this way throttling could
>>> be done probably in __set_page_dirty() as well.
>>>
>> I think the OpenVZ controller works that way.
>
> Well... looking at the code it seems that OpenVZ doesn't use this
> strategy, instead performs UBC-based I/O accounting looking at the
We do track the task (well - the beancounter) who made the page
dirty and then use this context for async write scheduling.
> __set_page_dirty*() for writes and submit_bio() for reads. Then,
> independently from accounting data, it uses per-UBC i/o priority model
> that is mapped directly on the CFQ i/o priority model.
Vasisly Tarasov (out I/O guru ;)) has already prepared an RFC patchset
for Jens with group scheduler (for sync requests only) and is going to
send it this or next week.
> -Andrea
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists