lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:32:39 +0900
From:	"K.Tanaka" <k-tanaka@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
CC:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] The kernel thread for md RAID1 could cause a md RAID1 array
 deadlock

Hi,

Thank you for the patch.
I have applied the patch to 2.6.23.14 and it works well.

- In case of 2.6.23.14, the problem is reproduced.
- In case of 2.6.23.14 with this patch, raid1 works well so far.
  The fault injection script continues to run, and it doesn't deadlock.
  I will keep it running for a while.

Also, md raid10 seems to have the same problem.
I will test raid10 applying this patch as well.


Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday January 15, k-tanaka@...jp.nec.com wrote:
>> This message describes the details about md-RAID1 issue found by
>> testing the md RAID1 using the SCSI fault injection framework.
>>
>> Abstract:
>> Both the error handler for md RAID1 and write access request to the md RAID1
>> use raid1d kernel thread. The nr_pending flag could cause a race condition
>> in raid1d, results in a raid1d deadlock.
> 
> Thanks for finding and reporting this.
> 
> I believe the following patch should fix the deadlock.
> 
> If you are able to repeat your test and confirm this I would
> appreciate it.
> 
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
> 
> 
> 
> Fix deadlock in md/raid1 when handling a read error.
> 
> When handling a read error, we freeze the array to stop any other
> IO while attempting to over-write with correct data.
> 
> This is done in the raid1d thread and must wait for all submitted IO
> to complete (except for requests that failed and are sitting in the
> retry queue - these are counted in ->nr_queue and will stay there during
> a freeze).
> 
> However write requests need attention from raid1d as bitmap updates
> might be required.  This can cause a deadlock as raid1 is waiting for
> requests to finish that themselves need attention from raid1d.
> 
> So we create a new function 'flush_pending_writes' to give that attention,
> and call it in freeze_array to be sure that we aren't waiting on raid1d.
> 
> Thanks to "K.Tanaka" <k-tanaka@...jp.nec.com> for finding and reporting
> this problem.
> 
> Cc: "K.Tanaka" <k-tanaka@...jp.nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> 
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
Kenichi TANAKA    | Open Source Software Platform Development Division
                  | Computers Software Operations Unit, NEC Corporation
                  | k-tanaka@...jp.nec.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ