[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4798E51C.4000209@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:21:00 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATE] x86: ignore spurious faults
Matt Mackall wrote:
> There's perhaps an opportunity to do this lazy TLB trick in the mmap
> path as well, where RW mappings are initially mapped as RO so we can
> catch processes dirtying them and then switched to RW. If the mapping is
> shared across threads on multiple cores, we can defer synchronizing the
> TLBs on the others.
>
I think spurious usermode faults are already dealt with.
handle_pte_fault() does essentially the same thing as this patch:
if (ptep_set_access_flags(vma, address, pte, entry, write_access)) {
update_mmu_cache(vma, address, entry);
} else {
/*
* This is needed only for protection faults but the arch code
* is not yet telling us if this is a protection fault or not.
* This still avoids useless tlb flushes for .text page faults
* with threads.
*/
if (write_access)
flush_tlb_page(vma, address);
}
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists