[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4799217F.4020805@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:38:39 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Oyvind Aabling <Oyvind.Aabling@...-c.dk>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/moxa.c, kernel 2.6.23.14
On 01/25/2008 12:34 AM, Oyvind Aabling wrote:
> Ah, I see, you want to get rid of moxaload altogether ...
Yes, I don't like such a loaders :).
> I'll test your patch series as soon as I get a chance - need to put a
> MOXA card into a non-production machine first, so it'll be a few days.
Ok, thanks, no problem.
> We have a few MOXA Intellio C320 Turbo PCI
> cards, here's lspci -vvxxx for one of them:
>
> 02:02.0 Serial controller: Moxa Technologies Co Ltd Intellio C320 Turbo
> PCI (rev 02) (prog-if 80)
> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
> Region 1: I/O ports at 9400 [size=128]
> Region 2: Memory at fb200000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
[...]
> The other cards looks identical, except for unimportant differences
> in region mapping and IRQ allocation due to system differences.
OK, doesn't matter, I was just curious if region 2 is really mem space.
thanks,
--js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists