[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080124033807.42D7B1E3C0C@siro.lan>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:38:07 +0900 (JST)
From: yamamoto@...inux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To: taka@...inux.co.jp
Cc: agk@...hat.com, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/2] dm-band: The I/O bandwidth controller:
Overview
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:53:50PM +0900, Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
> > > Dm-band gives bandwidth to each job according to its weight,
> > > which each job can set its own value to.
> > > At this time, a job is a group of processes with the same pid or pgrp or uid.
> >
> > It seems to rely on 'current' to classify bios and doesn't do it until the map
> > function is called, possibly in a different process context, so it won't
> > always identify the original source of the I/O correctly:
>
> Yes, this should be mentioned in the document with the current implementation
> as you pointed out.
>
> By the way, I think once a memory controller of cgroup is introduced, it will
> help to track down which cgroup is the original source.
do you mean to make this a part of the memory subsystem?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists