linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: ignore spurious faults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1201133916.16972.124.camel@brick>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:18:36 -0800
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ignore spurious faults

On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:05 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
> @@ -290,6 +290,53 @@ static int is_errata93(struct pt_regs *r
>  
> 
>  /*
> + * Handle a spurious fault caused by a stale TLB entry.  This allows
> + * us to lazily refresh the TLB when increasing the permissions of a
> + * kernel page (RO -> RW or NX -> X).  Doing it eagerly is very
> + * expensive since that implies doing a full cross-processor TLB
> + * flush, even if no stale TLB entries exist on other processors.
> + * There are no security implications to leaving a stale TLB when
> + * increasing the permissions on a page.
> + */
> +static int spurious_fault(unsigned long address,
> +			  unsigned long error_code)
> +{
> +	pgd_t *pgd;
> +	pud_t *pud;
> +	pmd_t *pmd;
> +	pte_t *pte;
> +
> +	/* Reserved-bit violation or user access to kernel space? */
> +	if (error_code & (PF_USER | PF_RSVD))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	pgd = init_mm.pgd + pgd_index(address);
> +	if (!pgd_present(*pgd))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
> +	if (!pud_present(*pud))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
> +	if (!pmd_present(*pmd))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address);
> +	if (!pte_present(*pte))
> +		return 0;
> +	if ((error_code & 0x02) && !pte_write(*pte))
> +		return 0;

	if ((error_code & PF_WRITE) && !pte_write(*pte))
		return 0;

> +
> +#if _PAGE_NX
> +	if ((error_code & PF_INSTR) && !pte_exec(*pte))
> +		return 0;
> +#endif
> +

How about dropping the #if and rely on the !pte_exec() test always
being false when _PAGE_NX = 0?  The compiler should just trim this
all away.

from pgtable.h:

static inline int pte_exec(pte_t pte)           { return !(pte_val(pte)
& _PAGE_NX); }

Cheers,

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/