linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: ignore spurious faults

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <479837F3.8090905@goop.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:02:11 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ignore spurious faults

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> writes:
>   
>> /*
>> + * Handle a spurious fault caused by a stale TLB entry.  This allows
>>     
>
> vmalloc_fault already has nearly the same logic. You should look
> at sharing the code.

Hm, I see what you mean, but its hard to see how to share much code 
there.  It's a case of "two lines common, one line different" repeated 4 
times or so.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/