[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22000.1201255093@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:58:13 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@...eee.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:10:11 +0100, "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" said:
> As a tester I would like:
> - slow merges, so that developer could rebase and test
> (compile test) the interaction of the new code.
An amazing amount of stuff gets caught when it's tested in Andrew Morton's -mm
tree. You think -rc1's are bad now, consider that much of what will be
25-rc1 already got tried as 24-rc6-mm1 and 24-rc8-mm1. Without those, the
-rc1 releases would be truly horrific.. ;)
> - you will introduce a new step on git management:
> Every changeset is compile-tested before going out to the world.
> I think this can be done automatically, and I think that one or
> two configurations are enough to find most of the problems.
It's true that a compile on x86 and a compile on PowerPC should flush out
most of the truly stupid mistakes, but those are usually found and fixed
literally within hours. Anyhow, the proper time for test compiles is *before*
it goes into the git trees at all - it should have been tested before it
gets sent to a maintainer for inclusion.
Plus, there's a *lot* of issues that "one or two configurations" won't
find - we continually find build issues that literally depend on 3 or 4
different CONFIG_* settings, and only misbehave for one specific combination.
And all the things that compile clean but explode at runtime.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists