linux-kernel - Re: [patch 25/26] mount options: fix udf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080125134158.GA7233@cvg>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:41:58 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [patch 25/26] mount options: fix udf

[Miklos Szeredi - Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:29:21AM +0100]
| > | +	/* is this correct? */
| > | +	if (sbi->s_anchor[2] != 0)
| > | +		seq_printf(seq, ",anchor=%u", sbi->s_anchor[2]);
| > 
| > you know, I would prefer to use form UDF_SB_ANCHOR(sb)[2]
| > in sake of style unification but we should wait for Jan's
| > decision (i'm not the expert in this area ;)
| 
| I think UDF_SB_ANCHOR macro was removed by some patch in -mm.
| 
| I'm more interested if the second element of the s_anchor array really
| does always have the value of the 'anchor=N' mount option.  I haven't
| been able to verify that fully.  Do you have some insight into that?
| 
| Thanks,
| Miklos
| 

Hello Miklos,

well, actually - no. anchor entities can be set to 0 if we have been failed
to read them in udf_find_anchor(). So it seems you've to use some
additional flag to store it.

Btw, Miklos the patch is over -mm tree?

		- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/