linux-kernel - Re: [patch 25/26] mount options: fix udf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1JIQub-0002Bd-CW@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:56:13 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	jack@...e.cz
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gorcunov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch 25/26] mount options: fix udf

>   Please use just 'int' for 'remount' option. We are slowly trying to
> get rid of these strange things in UDF code so adding new ones isn't
> desirable.

What's wrong with bool?

I'm not advocating mass replacements, but all new code _should_ use
it, because it's a very useful and good type.

We are just not very much used to it yet, but don't tell me it's
confusing to see a type like this ;)

Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/